espere ESPERE-ENC working area - preliminary unevaluated websitesEnvironmental Science Published for Everyobody Round the Earth
Printer friendly version of this page
[Master Home]    English Sitemap    [Master Sitemap]    www.espere.net   
Lower Atmosphere
basics
more
1. Oxidants & Observation
2. Radiation & greenhouse gases
- radiation
- CO2, CH4
- water
* Worksheet 1
* Worksheet 2
3. Ozone & fire
4. Gases in the atmosphere
     
 

Lower Atmosphere

Read more

Water vapour and clouds

Water vapour is known to be the most important greenhouse gas accounting for about 60% 1 of the greenhouse effect. So far the water vapour concentration has been assumed to be more or less constant and not to contribute to an additional greenhouse effect. This will change with the future warming of the Earth ...

 

 

basicsmore
basicsmore
basicsmore
basicsmore
basicsmore
basicsmore
basicsmore
basicsmore
 

Probably the greatest uncertainty in future projections of climate arises from the water vapour feedback as well as from clouds and their interaction with radiation.

 

Saturation

The capability of the air to keep water vapour increases with temperature. Warmer air can take up more water. The saturation curve shows, how much water air of a certain temperature may contain, before condensation begins (i.e. at a relative humidity of 100%). In the atmosphere however, air is usually unsaturated. The relative humidity RH is given by the following equation

and can vary a lot.

p = given partial vapour pressure of water
psat = water vapour pressure at saturation

The latter value depends on the temperature as shown in the graph on the right.

 

saturation curve

1. The water vapour saturation curve tells us, how much water the air can keep at maximum (100% humidity) at a certain temperature.
Please click to enlarge!

 

Generally it can be predicted, that an increasing air temperature leads to increasing evaporation and therefore to a higher amount of water vapour in the air. While ideal thermodynamic conditions are nearly fullfilled for evaporation processes in the boundary layer of the troposphere (up to 1-2 km), the modelling of the free troposphere is more complicated and here is the major greenhouse potential of a water vapour increase.

 

cloud radiation interaction

2. Clouds partially reflect the short radiation of the sun (yellow), but also absorb the long wave radiation of the Earth (red) and partially send it back like a greenhouse gas.
Picture source: Karlsruher Wolkenatlas © Bernhard Mhr (full size: 120 K)

 

Cloud formation

The consequence of increasing humidity is an increasing cloud cover. Clouds interact in two ways with radiation. On the one hand, they act like a greenhouse gas, absorb long wave radiation and send it back to the Earth. On the other hand they increase the Earth's albedo and scatter sunlight back to the space before it reaches the Earth. It strongly depends on the type of clouds, which effect is dominant. High clouds contribute to an additional warming, while low cloud reflect more sunlight and lead to a cooling.

 

Twofold feedback

The increase of water vapour and the cloud formation may lead to antipodal feedback on further warming of the Earth as shown in the following scheme. However it is not sure so far that the total impact of cloud formation will really be negative. Different models come to different conclusions (see IPCC TAR 2001, 7.2.2.5).

 

water vapour feedback

3. Feedbacks in the water cycle: Since global warming leads to increasing water vapour concentrations and more water vapour leads to further warming, we could have an amplification of the effect. Increasing cloud formation could counteract this effect. But in particular high clouds have a positive effect as well (dotted arrow). Our knowledge about clouds is not yet sufficient in order to explain how exactly the balance will be reached.
scheme: Elmar Uherek

 

Uncertainties

Cloud formation and strong differences in water vapour concentrations occur on a regional scale which falls below the grid size of climate models. Our climate models are too coarse to take into account every cloud appearing over a big lake or due to slope winds on hot summer days. Many uncertainties come from the dependence on:

- large scale dynamics
- sub-grid scale dynamics
- microphysics
- droplet size dependent interaction of clouds with radiation
- distinction in cloud water and cloud ice
and others.

The atmosphere is a very dynamic system and far away from a simple equilibrium. Depending on the latitude transport of moisture is driven by different processes:

  1. convection (vertical transport) in the tropics, where high cumulonimbus towers are formed
  2. large scale motions of highs and lows in the mid and higher latitude, where stratiform clouds dominate
  3. mostly advection (horizontal transport) in the dry areas between the tropics and midlatitudes.

 

4. Water vapour as part of a dynamic atmosphere
by EU (full size 60 K)

relative humidity

5. Global relative humidity distribution [%] in the free troposphere between 600 and 250 hPa (about 5-11 km altitude). Attention: Read this map carefully! The free troposphere over the south pole is more saturated than in the tropics relative to the possible maximum saturation, but it contains by far less water per cubicmeter, i.e. in absolute values.
source: IPCC TAR Fig. 7-1 (high resolution: 120 K)

 

Estimations of the water vapour and cloud feedback

Current estimations say, that for a doubling of CO2 in the air, i.e. a mixing ration of 560 ppm compared to the preindustrial value of 280 ppm (we had 370 ppm in 2001), the temperature increase will range between 1.5 - 4.5C. This wide range is mainly due to the uncertainty of the effect of cloud formation.

 

The doubling of CO2 without any other change would lead to an additional radiative forcing of 3.5-4 W/m2 (i.e. an temperature increase of 1.2C). Taking into account the estimations of the feedback of gaseous water only, this value would roughly double (7-8 W/m2). At this point, the impact of clouds has to be added, which may either lead to a slight cooling (regarded as more likely) or to an additional warming. The uncertainty range is estimated to be between -3 and +3 W/m2. This leads to an radiative forcing of about 4-11 W/m2 if CO2 doubles or a temperature increase between 1.5 and 4.5 C.

If you compare this to the 1.2C which would come from a CO2 doubling without other feedback you get an idea of what importance a better understanding of the water vapour impact for climate modelling is.

 

6. Radiative forcing estimation for a doubling of CO2, with and without water vapour and cloud feedback.
Diagramm Elmar Uherek, data IPCC TAR Chapter 7
Please click to enlarge! (30 K)

 

1 Some references even say, that water in the troposphere including the long wave absorption of clouds account for about 80% of the natural greenhouse effect (Curry&Webster, Thermodynamics of Atmospheres and oceans, Academic Press, 1999).

Related pages:

You find more about the interaction of clouds and radiation and its climate impact in:
Clouds & Particles - Basics - Unit 3 - Clouds and climate

 

About this page:
author: Elmar Uherek - Max Planck Institute, Mainz
1.  scientific reviewing: Dr. Susanne Nawrath, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research - 2003-06-10
2.  scientific reviewing: Dr. Benedikt Steil, Max Plack Institute for Chemistry, Mainz 2004-05-16
educational proofreading: Michael Seesing - Uni Duisburg - 2003-07-02
last published: 2004-05-17

 

 

 top

ESPERE / ACCENT

last updated 09.07.2005 12:32:14 | © ESPERE-ENC 2003 - 2013